Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
country-profiles:guide [2019/05/01 09:53] – edits from Carlos otd_wiki | country-profiles:guide [2019/05/29 11:56] (current) – [Gender] renamed to Inclusion otd_wiki | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
The page is organised according to the categories that are expected within each country profile. | The page is organised according to the categories that are expected within each country profile. | ||
- | The wiki is also designed to capture some of the information as fields in a database that will allow for some comparative analysis across countries. These fields are entered below the wiki in the form fields and are displayed in the wiki page as a variable. Items highlighted like <btn size=" | + | The wiki is also designed to capture some of the information as fields in a database that will allow for some comparative analysis across countries. These fields are entered below the wiki in the form fields and are displayed in the wiki page as a variable. Items captured |
<callout type=" | <callout type=" | ||
<callout type=" | <callout type=" | ||
- | |||
- | ^ ^ Name ^ Acronym | ||
- | | **Regulator** | ||
- | | **Ministry** | ||
- | | **Universal Service** | ||
- | | **Spectrum Agency** | ||
===== National Policy ===== | ===== National Policy ===== | ||
Line 148: | Line 142: | ||
== PtP Networks == | == PtP Networks == | ||
+ | In most scenarios the use of ISM bands for broadband transport links is sufficient and has all the advantages related to it: license exempt spectrum, highly available low-cost gear, etc. However, there might be places, specially in links going through nodes in crowded highsites, where the use of those bands may be good alternative. | ||
+ | |||
+ | The band considered below, 7GHz and 11 GHz are the most common ones and it below we would like to determine the requirements to using them. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ^ **Issues** | ||
+ | | Band assigned? | ||
+ | | Assignment method | ||
+ | | Fully assigned | ||
+ | | Primary use by CN? | | ||
+ | | Secondary use by CN? | | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Rows in the table: | ||
+ | * Has this band being assigned in your country?: Yes/No | ||
+ | * Method of assignment?: | ||
+ | * Is there spectrum yet to be assigned is this band: Yes / No / D.N.A. | ||
+ | * Are there reports of spectrum assigned but not used in an area? Yes / No / D.N.A. | ||
+ | * Can it be used by community networks and small operators? Yes / No / D.N.A. | ||
+ | * Indicate the community networks and small operators using them? Org name / D.N.A | ||
+ | |||
+ | [For each of the answers where the answer is yes, please provide a link] | ||
+ | |||
+ | Once this spectrum is assigned to one organization, | ||
=== License-Exempt === | === License-Exempt === | ||
Line 153: | Line 170: | ||
== Access Networks == | == Access Networks == | ||
^ **Frequency** | ^ **Frequency** | ||
+ | | // | ||
+ | | 902 – 928 MHz | '' | ||
| // | | // | ||
| 2400 – 2483.5 MHz | '' | | 2400 – 2483.5 MHz | '' | ||
Line 228: | Line 247: | ||
===== Backhaul ===== | ===== Backhaul ===== | ||
- | // This is a 4th category for me: 1. National Policy, 2. Licensing Framework, 3. Wireless Spectrum Regulation, 4. This. I believe there might be a 5th one about interconnection and the like? and another one about funding opportunities/ | + | Backhaul refers to the source of connectivity for a network. |
- | * links to backhaul | + | Increasing demand from internet users for access |
- | * Open Access policies | + | |
- | * infrastructure sharing policy and regulation | + | |
+ | Accordingly, | ||
+ | |||
+ | Fibre optic infrastructure is not the only option for backhaul. | ||
+ | |||
+ | In this section of the profile you will also be looking for policies and regulations related to backhaul infrastructure. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Finally, public information on backhaul pricing is [[good-practice: | ||
<callout type=" | <callout type=" | ||
* [[https:// | * [[https:// | ||
- | * [[http:// | + | * [[http:// |
+ | * [[http:// | ||
</ | </ | ||
- | ===== Gender | + | ===== Inclusion |
- | * links to national gender and ICT policies and initiatives | + | to be re-drafted |
- | * gender at the regulator | + | |
- | * number of men in senior management at regulator | + | |
- | * number of women in senior management at regulator '' | + | |
+ | < | ||
- | <callout type=" | + | Some places to start with this include looking for gender-disaggregated national statistics on communication network access as well as any research into gender and ICTs in your country. |
+ | |||
+ | It is also worth looking directly at the communication regulator. | ||
+ | |||
+ | * number of men in senior management at regulator | ||
+ | * number of women in senior management at regulator '' | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | <callout type=" | ||
+ | * [[https:// | ||
+ | * [[https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | </ | ||
===== Universal Service ===== | ===== Universal Service ===== | ||
- | * Point to universal | + | Universal Service in telecommunications refers |
- | * Have Universal Services funds been used to support community networks? | + | |
- | Does your Country offer support for local entrepreneurs that are implementing sustainable business models for the development of rural communications, either through | + | Another way in which universal service policies may manifest themselves is in coverage obligations attached to operator licenses, often to spectrum licenses purchased at auction. You may wish to list them here or in the spectrum licensing section and provide a link/ |
- | // As said, not sure about this... I would add them in different parts of the document... // | + | In this part of the profile, you should point to national universal service policies and obligations. In particular, it would be worth investigating whether universal services funds been used to support community networks |
- | * Obligations where they belong, (in the case of SA they are part of the spectrum licensing framework, I would add them to " | + | Does your Country offer support for local entrepreneurs that are implementing sustainable business models for the development |
- | * contributions to the fund where they belong, (In the case of SA they are part of the licensing framework, I would add them in "other administrative costs" | + | |
- | * opportunities to apply for them, where they belong. (as mentioned, it would be interesting to list some sort of potential sources of funding) | + | |
- | If you want to keep this section, maybe just an introduction on the top about their nature, | + | <callout type=" |
+ | * [[http:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | </ | ||
===== Cooperatives ===== | ===== Cooperatives ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | The [[https:// | ||
<callout type=" | <callout type=" | ||
- | * Does cooperative legislation exist? | + | * [[http:// |
- | * Are there tax relief | + | * [[https:// |
- | * Are there any limitations on cooperatives providing telecom/internet? | + | * [[http:// |
</ | </ | ||
===== Resources / References ===== | ===== Resources / References ===== | ||
- | * Other relevant web resources, reports, analysis. | + | This last section is optional and can be used to point to additional national |
---- | ---- | ||
== Coding examples == | == Coding examples == | ||
- | This could be used to frame specific | + | Within the wiki you can use this special formatting comments |
<callout type=" | <callout type=" | ||
Line 287: | Line 323: | ||
---- struct data ---- | ---- struct data ---- | ||
+ | countryprofile.regName : | ||
+ | countryprofile.regAcronym : | ||
+ | countryprofile.regUrl : | ||
+ | countryprofile.regTwitter : | ||
+ | countryprofile.regEmail : | ||
+ | countryprofile.minName : | ||
+ | countryprofile.minAcronym : | ||
+ | countryprofile.minUrl : | ||
+ | countryprofile.minTwitter : | ||
+ | countryprofile.minEmail : | ||
---- | ---- | ||